Bathroom Controversy

So Obama wants to tell us what bathroom to use. I don't remember seeing government's role in bathroom management in the Constitution.  Oh silly me, the Libtard-In-Chief doesn't believe in the Constitution, so we shouldn't be surprised.

Why is it that the LGBTQF community is .01 to .03 percent of the U.S. population, but 99.97 % have to bow down to them? This is the liberal way. Its really not about a little freaky-freaky in the bathroom, its about big government telling us how to live our lives.  The left never stops, do they? Here are some articles about liberalism on display:

5/13/16
http://thefederalist.com/2016/05/13/obama-threatens-schools-let-men-in-the-little-girls-room-or-else/

Obama Threatens Schools: Let Men In the Little Girls' Room Or Else

                                                                                                                   

Federal control over public schools has sent them into a death spiral, exemplified in the Obama administration’s new demands. Families need a new education ecosystem free from federal bullying.

The Obama administration is sending out an edict today to every school district in the country, insisting they open bathrooms, locker rooms, and showers to all children, regardless of sex, or risk federal discrimination lawsuits and yanked federal funds. Schools must treat children as transgender and thus entitled to open facilities access as soon as parents say they are, not after a medical diagnosis or birth certificate change. Schools may, however, give all the other kids with healthy gender identities curtains to hide behind or license to use toilet stalls to change.

In an eerie statement, Education Secretary John King—whom leading Republicans made sure would get confirmed despite his very public failures as New York’s education commissioner including his ardent, widely opposed support for Common Core—described the situation in a way that could apply both to gender-disordered children and opposite-sex children forced to get naked next to them at school.

“No student should ever have to go through the experience of feeling unwelcome at school or on a college campus,” he said. “We must ensure that our young people know that whoever they are or wherever they come from, they have the opportunity to get a great education in an environment free from discrimination, harassment and violence.” All children should be free from discrimination and harassment. Except the at-minimum 99.7 percent of kids who aren’t transgender. They just need to suck it up.

Texas Lt. Gov Dan Patrick unwittingly provided perhaps the best response to the federal trans steamroller in a statement this week about Fort Worth Superintendent Kent Scribner’s enactment of a similar policy before this recent increase in federal pressure. Patrick first called on Fort Worth parents to fire Scribner for “plac[ing] his own personal political agenda ahead of the more than 86,000 students attending 146 schools in the district…” Then, he hit the real everymother’s reaction (translated into lawmaker): “this may be an example of the need for the Legislature to pass a meaningful School Choice Bill.”

He’s right. Given the federal government’s stranglehold over public schools, school choice programs may be the only hope for parents who want to protect their children’s minds and souls but cannot homeschool or afford private school outright—meaning, most of us.

May 19, 2016

Charlotte Observer: Girls must overcome 'discomfort' at seeing male genitals in locker room

By Rick Moran

A shocking editorial in the Charlotte Observer counseled young girls to get over the "discomfort" they feel at the sight of male genitalia when transgender facilities are allowed in North Carolina.

The newspaper assumes the law will eventually be repealed or declared illegal. While that may or may not happen any time soon, it is the justification for this position used by the Observer that reveals the true nature of this battle of the bathroom.

Washington Times:

“This is what the Obama administration nudged the rest of the country toward Friday,” the editorial said. “Yes, the thought of male genitalia in girls’ locker rooms — and vice versa — might be distressing to some. But the battle for equality has always been in part about overcoming discomfort — with blacks sharing facilities, with gays sharing marriage — then realizing it was not nearly so awful as some people imagined.”

The notion that the Obama administration is "nudging" anything is laughable. The Obama Justice Department is shoving this rule down the throats of Americans, most of whom oppose the policy.
How is this issue remotely connected to race relations? It isn't, but gullible Americans will believe it, despite the disconnect from reality. Black and white people did not choose their race. By its very definition, transgendered people choose their gender identity. That's a monumental difference hidden in this politically correct message.

While admitting that exposure to male genitalia is a possible outcome of transgender bathroom laws, the editorial said the notion that such laws constitute a threat to the privacy and safety of women and children is a “political fiction” pushed by Republicans.
“Those safety issues are political fiction — non-transgender men wouldn’t have been allowed in women’s bathrooms under the Charlotte ordinance that HB 2 killed, and the 200 or so cities with similar ordinances have had no incidents involving bathroom predators,” the editorial said

So, biological men enter the bathroom used by biological women and this is not threat to the privacy of women? What spaceship brought this alien to earth? 

As for the safety of women, liberals believe that attacks by men in women's rooms will be rare, so it's ok - except,of course, for the parents of a young girl who is molested on one of those "rare" occassions. 
But "progress" demands we make those kinds of sacrifices, you ignorant hillbillies. 

When a man exposes himself on the street in front of a teenage girl, the police always offer the services of a psychologist to the young woman to help her deal with the trauma of seeing a male penis. Liberals will claim the context is different in a locker room or bathroom. That's nonsense. To a teenage girl, a penis is a penis and context is meaningless. 

But to the Charlotte Observer and the Obama administration, teenage girls being exposed to the sight of male genitals is something to be "overcome." In this lunatic world, we place the burden of transgender progress on young girls, telling them to just get over it.

A shocking editorial in the Charlotte Observer counseled young girls to get over the "discomfort" they feel at the sight of male genitalia when transgender facilities are allowed in North Carolina.
The newspaper assumes the law will eventually be repealed or declared illegal. While that may or may not happen any time soon, it is the justification for this position used by the Observer that reveals the true nature of this battle of the bathroom.
Washington Times:

“This is what the Obama administration nudged the rest of the country toward Friday,” the editorial said. “Yes, the thought of male genitalia in girls’ locker rooms — and vice versa — might be distressing to some. But the battle for equality has always been in part about overcoming discomfort — with blacks sharing facilities, with gays sharing marriage — then realizing it was not nearly so awful as some people imagined.”

The notion that the Obama administration is "nudging" anything is laughable. The Obama Justice Department is shoving this rule down the throats of Americans, most of whom oppose the policy.
How is this issue remotely connected to race relations? It isn't, but gullible Americans will believe it, despite the disconnect from reality. Black and white people did not choose their race. By its very definition, transgendered people choose their gender identity. That's a monumental difference hidden in this politically correct message.

While admitting that exposure to male genitalia is a possible outcome of transgender bathroom laws, the editorial said the notion that such laws constitute a threat to the privacy and safety of women and children is a “political fiction” pushed by Republicans.
“Those safety issues are political fiction — non-transgender men wouldn’t have been allowed in women’s bathrooms under the Charlotte ordinance that HB 2 killed, and the 200 or so cities with similar ordinances have had no incidents involving bathroom predators,” the editorial said

So, biological men enter the bathroom used by biological women and this is not threat to the privacy of women?

What spaceship brought this alien to earth? 

As for the safety of women, liberals believe that attacks by men in women's rooms will be rare, so it's ok - except,of course, for the parents of a young girl who is molested on one of those "rare" occassions. 

But "progress" demands we make those kinds of sacrifices, you ignorant hillbillies. 

When a man exposes himself on the street in front of a teenage girl, the police always offer the services of a psychologist to the young woman to help her deal with the trauma of seeing a male penis. Liberals will claim the context is different in a locker room or bathroom. That's nonsense. To a teenage girl, a penis is a penis and context is meaningless. 

But to the Charlotte Observer and the Obama administration, teenage girls being exposed to the sight of male genitals is something to be "overcome." In this lunatic world, we place the burden of transgender progress on young girls, telling them to just get over it.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/05/charlotte_observer_girls_must_overcome_discomfort_at_seeing_male_genitals_in_locker_room.html#ixzz49uhpR56B

 

The Enemy Within

April 1, 2016

The West’s War on Jihad Begins at Home

By Raymond Ibrahim

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/03/the_wests_war_on_jihad_begins_at_home.html#ixzz49uc4rpjD  As someone specializing in Islamic jihadism, one would expect I’d have much to say immediately after jihadi attacks of the sort that recently occurred in Brussels (35 killed), or San Bernardino (14 killed), or Paris (130). Ironically, I don’t: such attacks are ultimately symptoms of what I do deem worthy of discussion, namely, root causes. (What can one add when a symptom of the root cause he has long warned against occurs other than “told you so”?)

So what is the root cause of jihadi attacks? Many think that the ultimate source of the ongoing terrorization of the West is Islam. Yet this notion has one problem: the Muslim world is immensely weak and intrinsically incapable of being a threat. That every Islamic assault on the West is a terrorist attack -- and terrorism, as is known, is the weapon of the weak -- speaks for itself.

This was not always the case. For approximately one thousand years, the Islamic world was the scourge of the West. Today’s history books may refer to those who terrorized Christian Europe as Arabs, Saracens, Moors, Ottomans, Turks, Mongols, or Tatars -- but all were operating under the same banner of jihad that the Islamic State is operating under.

No -- today, the ultimate enemy is within. The root cause behind nonstop Muslim terrorization of the West is found in those who stifle or whitewash all talk and examination of Muslim doctrine and history; who welcome hundreds of thousands of Muslim migrants while knowing that some are jihadi operatives and many are simply “radical”; who work to overthrow secular Arab dictators in the name of “democracy” and “freedom,” only to uncork the jihad suppressed by the autocrats (the Islamic State’s territory consists of lands that were “liberated” in Iraq, Libya, and Syria by the U.S. and its allies).

So are Western leaders and politicians the root cause behind Islamic terrorization of the West?
Close -- but still not there yet.

Far from being limited to a number of elitist leaders and institutions, the Western empowerment of the jihad is the natural outcome of postmodern thinking -- the real reason an innately weak Islam can be a source of repeated woes for a militarily and economically superior West.

Remember, the reason people like French President Francois Hollande, U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama, and German Chancellor Angela Merkel are in power -- three prominent Western leaders who insist that Islam is innocent of violence and who push for Muslim immigration -- is because they embody a worldview that is normative in the West.

In this context, the facilitation of jihadi terror is less a top down imposition and more a grass root product of decades of erroneous, but unquestioned, thinking. (Those who believe America’s problems begin and end with Obama would do well to remember that he did not come to power through a coup but that he was voted in -- twice. This indicates that Obama and the majority of voting Americans have a shared, and erroneous, worldview. He may be cynically exploiting this worldview, but that doesn’t change the fact that it’s because this warped worldview is mainstream that he can exploit it in the first place.)

Western empowerment of the jihad is rooted in a number of philosophies that have metastasized into every corner of social life, becoming cornerstones of postmodern epistemology. These include the doctrines of relativism and multiculturalism on the one hand, and anti-Western, anti-Christian sentiment on the other.
Taken together, these cornerstones of postmodern, post-Christian thinking hold that there are no absolute truths and thus all cultures are fundamentally equal and deserving of respect. If any Western person wants to criticize a civilization or religion, then let them look “inwardly” and acknowledge their European Christian heritage as the epitome of intolerance and imperialism.

Add to these a number of sappy and silly ideals -- truth can never be uttered because it might “hurt the feelings” of some (excluding white Christians, who are fair game), and, far from suspecting them, the West should go out of its way to appease Muslims until they “like us” -- and you have a sure recipe for disaster, that is, the current state of affairs.

Western people are bombarded with these aforementioned “truths” from the cradle to the grave -- from kindergarten to university, from Hollywood to the news rooms, and now even in churches -- so that they are unable to accept and act on a simple truism that their ancestors well knew: Islam is an inherently violent and intolerant creed that cannot coexist with non-Islam (except insincerely, in times of weakness).

The essence of all this came out clearly when Obama, in order to rationalize away the inhuman atrocities of the Islamic State, counseled Americans to get off their “high horse” and remember that their Christian ancestors have been guilty of similar if not worse atrocities. That he had to go back almost a thousand years for examples by referencing the crusades and the Inquisition -- both of which have been completely distorted by the warped postmodern worldview, including the portrayal of imperialist Muslims as victims -- did not matter to America’s leader.

Worse, it did not matter to most Americans. The greater lesson was not that Obama whitewashed modern Islamic atrocities by misrepresenting and demonizing Christian history, but that he was merely reaffirming the mainstream narrative that Americans have been indoctrinated into believing. And thus, apart from the usual ephemeral and meaningless grumblings, his words -- as with many of his pro-Islamic, anti-Christian comments and policies -- passed along without consequence.

Once upon a time, the Islamic world was a superpower and its jihad an irresistible force to be reckoned with. Over two centuries ago, however, a rising Europe -- which had experienced over one millennium of jihadi conquests and atrocities -- defeated and defanged Islam.

As Islam retreated into obscurity, the post-Christian West slowly came into being. Islam didn’t change, but the West did: Muslims still venerate their heritage and religion -- which impels them to jihad against the Western “infidel” -- whereas the West learned to despise its heritage and religion, causing it to become an unwitting ally of the jihad.
Hence the current situation: the jihad is back in full vigor, while the West -- not just its leaders, but much of the populace -- facilitates it in varying degrees. Nor is this situation easily remedied. For to accept that Islam is inherently violent and intolerant is to reject a number of cornerstones of postmodern Western thinking that far transcend the question of Islam. In this context, nothing short of an intellectual/cultural revolution -- where rational thinking becomes mainstream -- will allow the West to confront Islam head on.

But there is some good news. With every Islamic attack, the eyes of more and more Western people are opened to the true nature of Muhammad’s religion. That this is happening despite generations of pro-Islamic indoctrination in the West is a testimony to the growing brazenness of the jihad.

Yet it still remains unclear whether objective thinking will eventually overthrow the current narrative of relativism, anti-Christianism, and asinine emotionalism.

Simply put, both celebrating multiculturalism and defeating the jihad is impossible.

However, if such a revolution takes place (sooner rather than later), the Islamic jihad will be easily swept back into the dustbin of history. For the fact remains: Islam is terrorizing the world, not because it can, but because the West allows it to.

As we remember our fallen heroes this weekend, remember we still have an enemy

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/05/03/anniversary-first-islamic-state-attack-american-soil-war-just-begun/

5/3/16--Today is the first anniversary of the Islamic State’s first attack in the homeland.

Just a couple of short months later, in response to the Chattanooga jihadi who slaughtered four Marines, one Navy officer said: “The War Has Just Begun. More to Come.”

He was right. Yet one year after jihadis attacked our Muhammad Art Exhibit and Cartoon Contest in defense of free speech, the West is in full surrender mode. In the wake of the Garland jihad attacks, the world says: let the bullies silence you. Don’t draw Muhammad. Comply with their other demands.

 

Garland changed everything for my colleagues and me. Its personal toll has been enormous. It has affected our lives and our careers in innumerable ways, all of them negative. Our security costs are now astronomical. We cannot step outside without remembering that we are hunted, and at any time jihadis could strike at us.

We went into the event with our eyes open. We knew the risks. But we knew the risks were greater, for our children and our children’s children, if we allowed the freedom of speech to be destroyed by violent intimidation.

Yet still we were cast as the villains. An imam told Sean Hannity that I should be executed. Non-Muslim media and political figures agreed with him that in standing for free speech, I had provoked the jihadis. Fox News host Martha McCallum pleaded with me to respect Islam and constrain myself. Bill O’Reilly said I “spurred” the violence. Erin Burnett accused me of “relishing” being targeted for beheading.

Alisyn Camerota on CNN battled with me, trying to bully me into adhering to sharia law.

Chris Cuomo was almost brought to tears by the thought of drawing Muhammad. Juan Williams and I had a knock-down drag out on Hannity. Geraldo Rivera compared me to the Aryan Nation, skinheads, and the KKK, and said, “Every time I see her on TV, I want to take a shower.”
Carly Fiorina likened our free speech event to white supremacist marching. Donald Trump said I was an obnoxious blowhard (!) who was taunting Muslims.

The list is long. The leftist networks (i.e., MSNBC) were unhinged. I could go on, but you get the picture.

One year on, jihad in America is raging. We were right. Gerard Perry wrote an excellent essay on the “shortsightedness of the media lynch mob.” But still people are afraid to have me speak. CPAC refused to allow me to host an event. Ironically, Donald Trump is suffering the same abuse I received from him, for speaking candidly about jihad terror and Muslim immigration.

What have we learned since Garland? Nothing. But here is what we know and what the media does not deign to cover, as they are too consumed with destroying the GOP and its presidential candidates. The mediasphere is devoid of actual news now.

Authorities investigated whether the San Bernardino jihad killers had been in touch with an alleged ISIS operative from Minnesota, just as one of the jihadis did before the Garland free speech shooting. The Muslim mastermind in the Garland jihad attack was indeed tied to ISIS. This represents an epic intel failure. That mastermind was convicted of conspiring to support ISIS in an Arizona trial. The FBI disclosed that a jihadi at our free speech event messaged multiple foreign Muslim fighters.

These were devout, observant Muslims. A former roommate of the Garland jihadis said they regularly participated in Friday prayers at their mosque, and wanted “to blow up nonbelievers.” He also said that they regular went target shooting after Friday prayers.

But the FBI is bound as a matter of policy to ignore things like that. The FBI failed to heed public warnings of jihadi plans to hit our free speech event.
More came out recently in the trial of the Boston Muslims who plotted to behead me last summer, after ISIS put a fatwa on my head. Even while awaiting trial, these jihadis tried to organize beheadings from jail. Prosecutors revealed that an ISIS ebook helped inspire the attack on me. A well-known ISIS operative instructed American Muslims to kill me.

An informant in the case on the jihad attack in Garland said there were 50 to 80 more Muslim terrorists out there, ready to strike. And yet TIME magazine lamented that Muhammad cartoons make Muslims “feel less safe.”

The Garland jihad was followed by a spate of ISIS-related attacks on American soil.
Here is a list of the acts of jihad in the US since the Garland, Texas jihad shooting. It is only the US — mind you, the Muslim invasion of Europe and its attendant violence, brutality, and supremacism is not included. This is just in the USA since Garland, May 3, 2015.

I was stunned assembling this list. Even me, and I have been covering jihad activity 24/7/365 for the past 13 years. I am stunned that we are more cowed than ever. Stunned that my colleagues and I are still blacklisted, shunned, and demonized. Stunned that hate groups such as the SPLC and terror-tied groups like CAIR and ISNA are given the imprimatur of legitimacy by the media and academic elites. Stunned, in light of the rivers of blood.
Since the Garland jihad plot:

In the Boston beheading plot, charges include material support for the Islamic State.

Feds arrested a fifth man in connection with a group of Brooklyn ISIS sympathizers who were charged with plotting to join the jihad group and attack the United States.

A Virginia Muslim teen pleaded guilty to helping ISIS.

Florida Muslims faced prison for a jihad mass murder bomb plot in New York City.

A Rhode Islam Muslim was tied to the Boston beheading plot.

In Kansas, a Muslim convert pleaded guilty in a WMD jihad suicide plot against the Wichita Airport. He aimed at inflicting “maximum carnage.”

In New Jersey, another Muslim was arrested for an ISIS plot, and his brothers were named as alleged co-conspirators.

In Ohio: a Muslim declared that he was ready to “cut off the head of his non-Muslim son” in order to prove his worth as a Muslim. He was indicted on charges of supporting the Islamic State.

An FBI agent was knife-attacked by a Muslim during an ISIS investigation in New York City.
The Feds revealed that the Muslims who attacked our Garland event had considered an attack on the Super Bowl.

A Muslim student was charged with plotting to bomb a New York City landmark and later cut a plea deal.

An ISIS Jihadist tweeted out my personal address and called on Muslims to kill me.
Last summer, thirty Muslims in the U.S. were arrested for a July 4 terror plot, reportedly including two women who called themselves “bad b*****s” and were plotting another Boston bombing, a National Guardsman who wanted to “repeat Charlie Hebdo,” and “Minnesota martyrs.”

A “strict Muslim” from Seattle was charged with murder and terrorism, including a double shooting outside a gay night club. He was on a terrorism watch list.

A Muslim convert who was the son of a Boston police captain was charged with plotting attacks on college campuses for ISIS. His alleged plot involved “explosives filled with black powder, nails, ball bearings and glass, in places where large numbers of people congregate, like college cafeterias.”

In Chattanooga, a Muslim shot five soldiers; he was inspired by ISIS.

In New York, a Muslim pizza shop owner was charged and later convicted for recruiting for the Islamic state.

In Washington, DC, a Muslim was charged with funding and recruiting for the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan.

US authorities sought to revoke the citizenship of an Oregon imam accused of “dealing directly” with Osama bin Laden.

The director of the FBI warned that the Islamic State was recruiting in all 50 states.

A Florida Muslim was arrested for an alleged WMD plot to bomb a Florida beach. Authorities say he expressed a desire to “cook American[s] … in cages” and also boasted: “We will destroy America” and “We will raise our black flag on top of your White House.”

A New York Muslim — who police say threatened to behead his daughter in 2013 — was charged with aiding ISIS and recruiting for it. A witness told the FBI that he argued ISIS’s murders of Muslims were justified because “the victims were not Muslims.”

A New Jersey Muslim was arrested for allegedly organizing a “small army” of ISIS fighters in New York and New Jersey.
Two Mississippi Muslims were charged with trying to join ISIS.

The FBI issued an alert about “Middle-Eastern males” who were approaching the family members of US military personnel.

A Florida Muslim who plotted a WMD attack on a beach had been cleared to work at the Key West airport, in a job that gave him direct access to secure areas.

A Mississippi Muslim allegedly threatened to kill non-Muslim hospital staff after issuing a series of bomb threats.

A US Muslim teen was jailed for more than 11 years for waging jihad with the Islamic State.

An Arizona Muslim was charged with supporting ISIS.

ISIS posted a list of 1,400 U.S. “targets”: “soon with the permission of Allah will strike at your necks in your own lands!”

A California Muslim pleaded guilty to trying to join ISIS.

ISIS claimed responsibility for a shooting at Umpqua College.

In New Jersey, a Muslim teen who supported ISIS was charged in a plot targeting the 9/11 Memorial.

Several Minnesota Muslims pleaded guilty to joining ISIS.

An ISIS-supporting Muslim was arrested in New York City. He said: “I’m ready to die for the Caliphate.”

The FBI foiled an Islamic plot to kill the Pope during his US visit.

ISIS threatened US colleges: “We are coming.”

At Union Station in Washington, DC, a knife-wielding man slashed a woman and charged at a police officer. Robert Spencer suggested that his name indicated an Islamic conversion.

Muslim students at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities (UMN) rejected a Moment of Recognition Resolution for 9/11, saying it was “Islamophobic.”

An ISIS-supporting Muslim in Ohio is charged with plotting to kill US soldiers and bomb churches and schools, allegedly posting online: “Behead them in their own homes.”’

The FBI revealed that it had 900 ongoing ISIS-related investigations.

Faisal Mohammad, a Muslim student at the University of California Merced, went on a stabbing spree, smiling as he slashed at his victims. Law enforcement officials said he was on a terror watch list, and the university was warned of the threat he posed, but nothing was done to stop him. Only many months later did the FBI finally admit that he was inspired by the Islamic State.

An NYPD undercover officer foiled a jihad bomb plot in New York City.

An Iranian-born engineer at a US defense contractor was given an eight-year sentence for giving details about US jets to Iran.

A Muslim who plotted to build a jihad-terror training camp in Oregon was also sentenced.

The US charged an American Muslim with helping an Al Qaeda-linked group.

In San Bernardino, two Muslims carried out a mass jihad shooting at a Christmas party, murdering 14 people. Before carrying out that jihad massacre, the San Bernardino jihad gunman had visited 11 school cafeterias. The San Bernardino jihadis pledged allegiance to ISIS during their attack. Nonetheless, the Obama Administration nixed a probe into the San Bernardino jihadists, who had practiced for their attack a year in advance. San Bernardino killer Syed Rizwan Farook discussed carrying out a jihad attack three years ago. A Muslim neighbor now faces federal charges for providing the San Bernardino jihadis with guns. Three relatives of the jihad killers were later arrested.

In Minnesota, a Muslim refugee from Somalia was arrested for allegedly aiding ISIS.

In California, a Muslim reportedly brandished a sword and chased down a neighbor while screaming, “I would die and kill for Allah.”

In Philadelphia, a Muslim stands accused of shooting a police officer thirteen times. According to local media, eyewitnesses reported that he exclaimed he did it “in the name of Islam.” His imam lied about the shooter’s ties to his mosque. The FBI opened an investigation into the shooter’s ties to a larger Islamic terror cell. Police later said that he had pledged allegiance to ISIS.

A Muslim refugee in California was arrested on terror charges including lying to federal agents about joining a jihad terror group in Syria.

A New York Muslim allegedly planned a New Year’s machete attack in the name of ISIS.

The attempted beheading of a 9-year-old New York boy was seen as an “ISIS audition.’”

A California Muslim was arrested for allegedly threatening jihad on police and making a bomb threat.

A freeway jihad-terror plot raised worries in Southern California.

A Muslim man in Pennsylvania was charged with supporting the Islamic State, and court documents say he was seeking to buy a Yazidi slave girl. The Philly Muslim teen allegedly operated 57 Twitter accounts for ISIS propaganda and recruitment.

A devout Muslim allegedly threatened to kill NYPD and Philadelphia cops — and pledged allegiance to ISIS.

In Virginia, two Muslims were charged in yet another ISIS terror plot.

A Muslim refugee allegedly planned to bomb Texas malls, saying: “I am against America.”

Prosecutors say a Muslim refugee in California was “eager to see blood” and wanted to learn “long range shooting.” He allegedly said that “Allah has facilitated” his travels.
41 Muslim “refugees” in the US were arrested on jihad terror charges.

In Columbus, Ohio, a Muslim named Muhammad Barry slashed at patrons in a restaurant owned by a proudly pro-Israel Israeli Christian.

In Washington, a Muslim prisoner allegedly screamed “Allahu akbar” and tried to kill a corrections officer.

An Washington Muslim was arrested on charges of supporting ISIS. He allegedly said: “I feel the duty to kill” U.S. servicemen and stand accused of plotting to attack a military base.

A Michigan Muslim, 22, was arrested for “planning to shoot up a church to support ISIS.” FBI documents quote him as saying: “It is my dream to behead someone.”

A Kansas Muslim vowed to “bring the Islamic State straight to your doorstep” with a 1,000 pound bomb.

A North Carolina ISIS terrorist was indicted for allegedly killing his neighbor and asking an FBI agent to kill his parents, as part of an alleged jihad plot to kill 1,000 people.

A Florida Muslim leader referred to Jews as “pigs” and “monkeys.” This kind of language incites Muslims to violence.

The FBI thwarted a mass shooting at a Milwaukee Masonic temple allegedly plottedby a devout Muslim. He reportedly said: “We are Muslims defending the Muslim religion.”

A Muslim veteran of the US Air Force was found guilty of trying to join ISIS.
ISIS issued a kill list of Air Force, FBI, and military personnel, along with government officials, commanding Muslims to “slay them wherever you find them.”

In New York City, a Muslim man with a long rap sheet allegedly ambushed and fired upon eight NYPD cops, injuring two officers.

A Muslim who had been in contact with ISIS was charged with threatening to blow up a Walgreens in a Minneapolis suburb.

An anonymous threat against an NBA game in Los Angeles reportedly said: “You are all going to [expletive] die tonight, you filthy Americans.”

A Virginia Muslim pleaded guilty to conspiring to help ISIS; prosecutors quoted him as wanting to “chop [off] heads.”

The Muslim father of an ISIS member in Virginia attacked reporters on camera.

The Feds alleged that devout Muslims in Minnesota spoke of carrying out jihad terror attacks inside the US for the Islamic State. One suspect revealed plans to open up a route from Syria to the U.S. through Mexico.

The ISIS United Cyber Caliphate posted 3,600 NY residents’ names and addresses, saying: “We Want Them #Dead”

A Michigan church website was defaced with an ominous jihadi message from ISIS.

The result of this epidemic of jihad attacks? Obama’s dawah speech about how “Islam is Peace” is repeated weekly, sometimes daily now.

What have we learned? Are mosques being monitored? All of these jihadis regularly worshiped at mosques. What is being taught at these mosques? Are investigators simply going to assume that these mosques are “moderate” and that the jihadis are “radicalized” elsewhere? If that is true, why couldn’t the peaceful teachings they heard at the mosque withstand the appeal of the “radicals”?

Right now, nothing is being done to stop jihad recruiting in U.S. mosques, even as several hundred young Muslims from the U.S. have gone to wage jihad for the Islamic State and are now waging jihad here.

U.S. law enforcement officials must take it upon themselves to learn about what Islam and jihad are really all about, then strategize accordingly about how to stop it. The mosques must be monitored. Muslim immigration must stop.

All over the world, the brutal sharia is being imposed on non-Muslims and free thinkers. Bangladesh is awash in the blood of free thinkers, poets, secularists, and non-Muslims. The slaughter there is daily now.

Devout Muslims tried to kill us in Garland one year ago today for the same reason: perceived insults to Muhammad — in other words, violation of Islamic law.

Under Islamic law, just a whisper that you offended or criticized Muhammad, and you are marked for death. It’s just that simple. The world is looking away, just as it did during the rise of the Third Reich. Deaf, dumb, blind is the world to the extermination of millions in jihad wars. There is no excuse now. Echoing Dr. Ernst Janning from Judgment at Nuremberg, no one can pretend not to know. There are websites — mine, Jihad Watch, The Religion of Peace, et al. “We didn’t know” won’t fly. The world was guilty then, and the world is guilty now. Then, the world said, “take Sudetenland. Take the Rhineland, Take Austria. Take Czechoslovakia.” And now, the world says, take Syria. Take Gaza, Take Judea, Samaria, Lebanon, the Ivory Coast, Libya…

The world says, “Islam is peace.” The world says, “It’s not millions of victims, it’s hundreds.” That’s a blatant lie, but what difference does that make? We stand for justice, truth, and the value of a single human.

What will you tell your children and grandchildren when they ask you, “Where were you?”